VPG vs. MWA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA).

Performance

VPG vs. MWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VPG vs. MWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc.	14.21%	64.04%	-31.11%	-11.85%	4.12%	17.92%	-7.41%	12.47%	20.20%	33.07%
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc.	18.08%	7.01%	58.45%	36.27%	-23.81%	18.06%	5.45%	34.32%	-26.09%	-4.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VPG : $583.88M MWA : $4.41B
EPS VPG : $0.40 MWA : $1.27
PE Ratio VPG : 110.57 MWA : 22.12
PS Ratio VPG : 1.91 MWA : 3.06
PB Ratio VPG : 1.74 MWA : 4.33
Total Revenue (TTM) VPG : $307.20M MWA : $1.44B
Gross Profit (TTM) VPG : $119.43M MWA : $537.60M
EBITDA (TTM) VPG : $23.52M MWA : $311.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than MWA's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VPG has underperformed MWA with an annualized return of 11.76%, while MWA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.

VPG

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 14.21%
• 6M: 34.34%
• 1Y: 87.03%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

MWA

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -5.49%
• YTD: 18.08%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 10.35%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 16.40%
• 10Y*: 12.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VPG vs. MWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPG

VPG Risk / Return Rank: 79
VPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VPG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
VPG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MWA

MWA Risk / Return Rank: 51
MWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MWA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MWA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPG vs. MWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VPG	MWA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.34	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.68	+1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.09	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	0.72	+1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	1.43	+5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VPG vs. MWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the MWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPG and MWA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VPG	MWA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	0.34	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.54	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.39	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.09	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between VPG and MWA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VPG vs. MWA - Dividend Comparison

VPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc.	0.98%	1.14%	1.15%	1.72%	2.18%	1.55%	1.72%	1.71%	2.20%	1.28%	0.83%	0.91%

Drawdowns

VPG vs. MWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPG drawdown since its inception was -60.04%, smaller than the maximum MWA drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPG and MWA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPG	MWA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.04%	-91.80%	+31.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.04%	-16.11%	-15.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.69%	-41.27%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.04%	-46.67%	-13.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.45%	-6.93%	-14.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.44%	-40.64%	+16.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.29%	8.07%	+4.22%

Volatility

VPG vs. MWA - Volatility Comparison

Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) has a higher volatility of 17.35% compared to Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) at 7.24%. This indicates that VPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VPG	MWA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.35%	7.24%	+10.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.30%	16.02%	+27.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.10%	30.25%	+35.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.06%	30.39%	+10.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.61%	32.16%	+7.45%

Financials

VPG vs. MWA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and Mueller Water Products, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VPG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 29.67M and revenue of 80.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

MWA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.80M and revenue of 318.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

VPG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04M and revenue of 80.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

MWA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.70M and revenue of 318.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

VPG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a net income of -1.87M and revenue of 80.57M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

MWA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 43.20M and revenue of 318.20M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.