VPG vs. MWA
VPG (Vishay Precision Group, Inc.) and MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) are both stocks. VPG operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while MWA operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, VPG returned 25.62%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for MWA. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VPG vs. MWA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPG achieves a 237.48% return, which is significantly higher than MWA's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VPG has outperformed MWA with an annualized return of 25.62%, while MWA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.
VPG
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 116.44%
- YTD
- 237.48%
- 6M
- 253.74%
- 1Y
- 398.77%
- 3Y*
- 53.78%
- 5Y*
- 30.20%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
MWA
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
VPG vs. MWA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc. | 237.48% | 64.04% | -31.11% | -11.85% | 4.12% | 17.92% | -7.41% | 12.47% | 20.20% | 33.07% |
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 6.24% | 7.01% | 58.45% | 36.27% | -23.81% | 18.06% | 5.45% | 34.32% | -26.09% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPG and MWA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
VPG:
$1.73B
MWA:
$3.96B
VPG:
$0.44
MWA:
$1.32
VPG:
292.26
MWA:
19.11
VPG:
5.41
MWA:
2.71
VPG:
5.16
MWA:
3.70
VPG:
$319.82M
MWA:
$1.46B
VPG:
$125.26M
MWA:
$550.00M
VPG:
$23.27M
MWA:
$311.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPG vs. MWA — Risk / Return Rank
VPG
MWA
VPG vs. MWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPG | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.05 | +0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.67 | 0.20 | +14.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.27 | 0.47 | +39.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPG | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.37 | 0.14 | +6.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.32 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.07 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
VPG vs. MWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPG drawdown since its inception was -60.04%, smaller than the maximum MWA drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPG and MWA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPG | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.04% | -91.80% | +31.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.40% | -18.55% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.86% | -25.85% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.69% | -41.27% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.04% | -46.67% | -13.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -16.87% | +14.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.22% | -40.38% | +16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 7.96% | +2.00% |
Volatility
VPG vs. MWA - Volatility Comparison
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) has a higher volatility of 32.36% compared to Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) at 6.76%. This indicates that VPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPG | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.36% | 6.76% | +25.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.66% | 17.64% | +33.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.21% | 26.19% | +37.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.74% | 30.62% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.60% | 32.23% | +9.37% |
Dividends
VPG vs. MWA - Dividend Comparison
VPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.15% | 1.72% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 0.91% |
VPG Vishay Precision Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VPG vs. MWA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and Mueller Water Products, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VPG vs. MWA - Profitability Comparison
VPG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.87M and revenue of 84.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
MWA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.50M and revenue of 384.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
VPG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 340.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
MWA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
VPG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a net income of -319.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
MWA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 59.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VPG and MWA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPG has higher volatility (32.36%) compared to MWA (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPG dropped -60.04% vs MWA's -91.80%.
VPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.37 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPG and MWA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer