PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPC vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VPC vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VPC vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
-11.66%-6.75%10.52%22.20%5.51%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
-0.97%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -11.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's -0.97% return.


VPC

1D
2.93%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-11.66%
6M
-12.28%
1Y
-16.52%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*

QQQS

1D
4.87%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-0.97%
6M
2.84%
1Y
49.21%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VPC vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPC has a 5.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VPC vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPC vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPCQQQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.00

1.61

-2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.30

2.20

-3.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.28

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

2.81

-3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.75

9.71

-11.47

VPC vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPC Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPC and QQQS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPCQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

1.61

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.36

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between VPC and QQQS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VPC vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.77%, more than QQQS's 3.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
17.77%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.51%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VPC vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and QQQS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VPCQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.45%

-38.06%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.76%

-16.53%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.75%

-9.42%

-12.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-13.84%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

4.78%

+4.81%

Volatility

VPC vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) is 5.51%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that VPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VPCQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

10.32%

-4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

19.93%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

30.79%

-14.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

28.42%

-15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

28.42%

-7.74%