PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.82%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VOOV

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.76%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
11.82%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.51%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and VT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.87

The correlation between VOOV and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOV
VT

Technology

19.0%
27.8%

Financial Services

15.0%
15.9%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.5%

Industrials

11.0%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.8%

Energy

7.6%
4.3%

Utilities

4.6%
2.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

3.4%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.3%
8.3%

Technology

VOOV
19.0%
VT
27.8%

Financial Services

VOOV
15.0%
VT
15.9%

Healthcare

VOOV
11.6%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOV
11.1%
VT
9.5%

Industrials

VOOV
11.0%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

VOOV
9.5%
VT
4.8%

Energy

VOOV
7.6%
VT
4.3%

Utilities

VOOV
4.6%
VT
2.7%

Basic Materials

VOOV
3.5%
VT
4.2%

Real Estate

VOOV
3.4%
VT
2.4%

Communication Services

VOOV
3.3%
VT
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOVVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.04

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

13.53

-0.49

VOOV vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOVVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.31

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.69

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.44

+0.31

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-50.27%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-9.67%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-16.51%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-26.38%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-34.24%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.88%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-7.02%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.17%

-0.53%

Volatility

VOOV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.01%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

3.83%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

10.17%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

12.70%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

16.05%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.23%

-0.28%

VOOV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and VT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 11.82% for VOOV. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer