VOOV vs. SMH
VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOV returned 11.69%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VOOV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.69%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.
VOOV
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
SMH
- 1D
- -9.22%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 6M
- 56.81%
- 1Y
- 127.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.39%
- 5Y*
- 36.10%
- 10Y*
- 36.02%
VOOV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.22% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOV and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VOOV and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOOV vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOV
SMH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
VOOV
SMH
Financial Services
VOOV
SMH
-
Healthcare
VOOV
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOOV
SMH
-
Industrials
VOOV
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VOOV
SMH
-
Energy
VOOV
SMH
-
Utilities
VOOV
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VOOV
SMH
-
Real Estate
VOOV
SMH
-
Communication Services
VOOV
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VOOV
SMH
VOOV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.59 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 8.58 | -5.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 32.42 | -19.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 4.00 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.03 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.11 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.32 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
VOOV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -84.96% | +47.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -14.93% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -35.74% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -45.30% | +27.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.31% | -45.30% | +7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -10.69% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -41.08% | +37.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.94% | -2.30% |
Volatility
VOOV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.42%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 14.88% | -12.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 26.35% | -19.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 32.03% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 35.24% | -20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 32.70% | -15.75% |
VOOV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOV and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to VOOV (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs 11.69% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer