VOOV vs. MTUM

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOV returned 11.89%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for MTUM. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

VOOV vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 25.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 11.89%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.

VOOV

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.31%
• 6M: 8.38%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 1Y: 22.08%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 11.89%
• ALL TIME*: 12.29%

MTUM

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 22.43%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 1Y: 30.22%
• 3Y*: 30.59%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 16.22%
• ALL TIME*: 15.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	$597.51M	$632.59M	$554.70M
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	$18.18M	$15.18M	$15.44M

VOOV vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	12.00%	13.10%	12.21%	22.15%	-5.37%	24.87%	1.23%	31.75%	-9.09%	15.26%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	25.44%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and MTUM is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOV and MTUM has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOV vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOOV	MTUM
Technology	21.7%	48.3%
Financial Services	14.9%	5.2%
Healthcare	12.2%	4.2%
Industrials	10.7%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	3.7%
Energy	6.6%	11.5%
Utilities	4.4%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.2%
Real Estate	3.3%	1.5%
Communication Services	2.7%	4.4%

Return for Risk

VOOV vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOV

VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 86
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 44
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOV vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOOV	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.18	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.68	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	1.69	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	6.74	+6.88

VOOV vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOOV	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.31%	-34.08%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-17.99%	+11.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-20.99%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.10%	-32.28%	+14.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.31%	-34.08%	-3.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.23%	+9.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-6.22%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	4.49%	-2.87%

Volatility

VOOV vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.69%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOOV	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	11.35%	-8.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	23.51%	-16.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	25.79%	-15.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	21.96%	-7.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	21.76%	-4.87%

VOOV vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOOV vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than MTUM's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.59%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	1.64%	1.76%	2.10%	1.69%	2.19%	1.87%	2.45%	2.10%	2.65%	2.13%	2.24%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOOV and MTUM in my portfolio?

VOOV and MTUM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOOV or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to VOOV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, VOOV or MTUM?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 16.22% vs 11.89% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOOV or MTUM?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 16.22% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOOV or MTUM?

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOOV or MTUM?

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.59% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between VOOV and MTUM?

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.