PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 18.83% return.


VOOV

1D
1.06%
1M
2.31%
6M
8.38%
YTD
12.00%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

MFUS

1D
1.95%
1M
1.60%
6M
12.71%
YTD
18.83%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.13M$1.05M$961.83K
$18.18M$15.18M$15.44M

VOOV vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
12.00%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%10.47%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
18.83%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and MFUS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.90

The correlation between VOOV and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOV vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOV
MFUS

Technology

21.7%
25.8%

Financial Services

14.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

12.2%
14.7%

Industrials

10.7%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
9.3%

Energy

6.6%
6.6%

Utilities

4.4%
1.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.5%

Real Estate

3.3%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.6%

Technology

VOOV
21.7%
MFUS
25.8%

Financial Services

VOOV
14.9%
MFUS
11.3%

Healthcare

VOOV
12.2%
MFUS
14.7%

Industrials

VOOV
10.7%
MFUS
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOV
10.5%
MFUS
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

VOOV
8.8%
MFUS
9.3%

Energy

VOOV
6.6%
MFUS
6.6%

Utilities

VOOV
4.4%
MFUS
1.3%

Basic Materials

VOOV
3.6%
MFUS
2.5%

Real Estate

VOOV
3.3%
MFUS
2.0%

Communication Services

VOOV
2.7%
MFUS
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOV vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

4.23

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

15.97

-2.35

VOOV vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-35.21%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-6.39%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-15.39%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-18.22%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.95%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.69%

-0.07%

Volatility

VOOV vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.69%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.49%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

9.26%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

11.53%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

15.03%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

17.29%

-0.40%

VOOV vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOV vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than MFUS's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.35%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.64%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and MFUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to VOOV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.31% vs 11.80% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.35% for MFUS.

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer