VOOM.DE vs. QQQI
VOOM.DE (Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOM.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equileap Global Gender Equality, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. VOOM.DE is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, VOOM.DE returned 20.20% vs 27.05% for QQQI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOOM.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VOOM.DE is traded in EUR, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOM.DE achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.93% return.
VOOM.DE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VOOM.DE Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 8.02% | 9.44% | 11.97% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.93% | 4.55% | 25.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOM.DE and QQQI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
VOOM.DE
QQQI
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (VOOM.DE) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOM.DE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.43 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 11.30 | -0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOM.DE and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOM.DE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -24.57% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.56% | -7.92% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.02% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -4.00% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.40% | -0.49% |
Volatility
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (VOOM.DE) is 2.77%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that VOOM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOM.DE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 6.88% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 11.14% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 14.92% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 18.82% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 18.82% | -3.01% |
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOM.DE vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
VOOM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.78% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
VOOM.DE Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOM.DE and QQQI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOOM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOOM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
VOOM.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VOOM.DE and 0.68% for QQQI.
Find the right allocation for VOOM.DE and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer