VOOG vs. GDX
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOG returned 17.86%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for GDX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
VOOG vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 17.86%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.
VOOG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
VOOG vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.67% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and GDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.19 |
The correlation between VOOG and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOOG vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOG
GDX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
VOOG
GDX
-
Communication Services
VOOG
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOOG
GDX
-
Financial Services
VOOG
GDX
-
Industrials
VOOG
GDX
-
Healthcare
VOOG
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
VOOG
GDX
-
Real Estate
VOOG
GDX
-
Utilities
VOOG
GDX
-
Basic Materials
VOOG
GDX
Energy
VOOG
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
GDX
VOOG vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOG | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.40 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 3.87 | +4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -80.34% | +47.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -36.28% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -36.28% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -46.51% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -49.79% | +17.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -30.91% | +26.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -40.41% | +35.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 13.11% | -9.71% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) is 6.29%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that VOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 17.20% | -10.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 39.15% | -25.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 46.89% | -30.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 36.74% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 37.34% | -16.56% |
VOOG vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOG vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than GDX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOG and GDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to VOOG (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 13.29% for GDX. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while GDX is Gold. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.51% for GDX.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer