PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. XDWH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%

XDWH.L

1D
2.99%
1M
2.38%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-2.74%15.25%0.75%3.81%-5.42%20.56%12.88%22.95%1.57%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and XDWH.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.39

The correlation between VOO and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
XDWH.L

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%
98.9%

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
0.5%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.7%
XDWH.L

-

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
XDWH.L

-

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
XDWH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
XDWH.L

-

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
XDWH.L
98.9%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
XDWH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
XDWH.L
0.5%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
XDWH.L

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
XDWH.L

-

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
XDWH.L

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
XDWH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.L
XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOXDWH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.11

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

2.80

+10.73

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and XDWH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOXDWH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.79

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.32

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.52

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.57

+0.31

Drawdowns

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and XDWH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOXDWH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-26.24%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-10.39%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-19.28%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-19.28%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-26.24%

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-5.82%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-4.98%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.12%

-2.20%

Volatility

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOXDWH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.80%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

10.77%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

14.57%

-2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

14.18%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

14.97%

+3.05%

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for XDWH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and XDWH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer