VOO vs. XDWH.L
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.23%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.45% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and XDWH.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016 | 0.39 |
The correlation between VOO and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
XDWH.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
VOO
XDWH.L
Industrials
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
XDWH.L
Energy
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Basic Materials
VOO
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
XDWH.L
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.11 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 2.80 | +10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 0.79 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.32 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.57 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -26.24% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -10.39% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -19.28% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -19.28% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -26.24% | -7.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -5.82% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -4.98% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 4.12% | -2.20% |
Volatility
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.80% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 10.77% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 14.57% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 14.18% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 14.97% | +3.05% |
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for VOO and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer