PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.62% return.


VOO

1D
1.74%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.51%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.72%

VBIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.99%14.15%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
1.62%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and VBIL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-35.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

21.06

-19.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

42.54

-39.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

531.57

-517.32

VOO vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 15.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-0.09%

-33.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-0.09%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

0.00%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-0.00%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.01%

+1.96%

Volatility

VOO vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

0.05%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

0.16%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

0.26%

+12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

0.30%

+16.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

0.30%

+17.75%

VOO vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and VBIL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 27.95% vs 3.93% for VBIL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 27.95% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while VBIL is Ultrashort Bond. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.06 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer