PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOO having a 9.08% return and URTH slightly lower at 8.91%. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 15.50%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

URTH

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.60%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
8.91%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and URTH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012

0.86

The correlation between VOO and URTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. URTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
URTH

Technology

35.7%
28.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.8%

Industrials

8.3%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.2%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.3%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
URTH
28.3%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
URTH
15.8%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
URTH
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
URTH
9.3%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
URTH
8.8%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
URTH
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
URTH
5.2%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
URTH
4.2%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
URTH
2.7%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
URTH
1.9%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
URTH
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOURTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.56

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

11.37

+1.05

VOO vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and URTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-34.01%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.06%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-16.94%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-26.05%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-34.01%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-1.87%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-4.37%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.04%

-0.07%

Volatility

VOO vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.55%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

10.11%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

12.57%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.26%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.29%

+0.74%

VOO vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than URTH's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.36%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VOO and URTH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URTH has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs URTH's -34.01%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 13.38% for URTH. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 13.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for URTH.

URTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while URTH is Global Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.24% for URTH.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer