VOO vs. RWR
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RWR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for RWR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RWR.
Performance
VOO vs. RWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed RWR with an annualized return of 15.50%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
RWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
VOO vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 16.67% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 22.71% | -4.47% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and RWR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and RWR has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOO vs. RWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
RWR
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
RWR
-
Financial Services
VOO
RWR
Communication Services
VOO
RWR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
RWR
-
Healthcare
VOO
RWR
-
Industrials
VOO
RWR
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
RWR
-
Energy
VOO
RWR
-
Utilities
VOO
RWR
Real Estate
VOO
RWR
Basic Materials
VOO
RWR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
RWR
VOO vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.49 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 8.47 | +3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and RWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -74.92% | +40.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -8.04% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -18.85% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -32.58% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -44.39% | +10.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | 0.00% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -13.09% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.36% | -0.39% |
Volatility
VOO vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.93% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 9.94% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 13.72% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 19.04% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 21.52% | -3.49% |
VOO vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RWR's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.27% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and RWR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs RWR's -74.92%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.
RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while RWR is REIT. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for RWR.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and RWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer