PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. RWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. RWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed RWR with an annualized return of 15.50%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

RWR

1D
0.93%
1M
3.35%
YTD
16.67%
6M
16.81%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
16.67%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and RWR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and RWR has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOO vs. RWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
RWR

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
98.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.7%
RWR

-

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
RWR
0.0%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
RWR

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
RWR

-

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
RWR

-

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
RWR

-

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
RWR

-

Energy

VOO
3.5%
RWR

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
RWR
0.0%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
RWR
98.6%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
RWR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOORWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.49

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

8.47

+3.96

VOO vs. RWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the RWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and RWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and RWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOORWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-74.92%

+40.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.04%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-18.85%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-32.58%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-44.39%

+10.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

0.00%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-13.09%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.36%

-0.39%

Volatility

VOO vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOORWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.93%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.94%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

13.72%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

19.04%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

21.52%

-3.49%

VOO vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RWR's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.27%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and RWR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWR has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs RWR's -74.92%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while RWR is REIT. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for RWR.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and RWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer