VOO vs. NVO
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.35%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for NVO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VOO vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 15.35%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
NVO
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- -16.56%
- 6M
- -9.23%
- 1Y
- -42.47%
- 3Y*
- -17.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
VOO vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -16.56% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and NVO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
NVO
VOO vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.86 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | -0.77 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | -1.14 | +14.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | -0.82 | +2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.05 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.19 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.47 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -74.70% | +40.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -55.03% | +46.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -74.70% | +56.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -74.70% | +50.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -74.70% | +40.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -70.19% | +67.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -17.77% | +14.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 37.21% | -35.29% |
Volatility
VOO vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 9.75% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 38.30% | -28.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 52.08% | -40.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 38.31% | -21.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 32.56% | -14.53% |
Dividends
VOO vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than NVO's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.39% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and NVO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs NVO's -74.70%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer