PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. MCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. MCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed MCD with an annualized return of 15.50%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

MCD

1D
0.01%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-5.66%
6M
-8.96%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
1.94%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-5.66%7.89%0.14%15.06%0.51%27.79%11.30%13.97%5.78%45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and MCD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and MCD has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MCD
MCD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOMCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.98

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.20

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

-0.50

+12.93

VOO vs. MCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the MCD Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and MCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and MCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOMCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-73.20%

+39.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-19.05%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-19.05%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-19.05%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-36.90%

+2.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-15.46%

+13.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-14.89%

+11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

7.53%

-5.56%

Volatility

VOO vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while McDonald's Corporation (MCD) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOMCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.96%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

12.20%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

16.62%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.27%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

20.40%

-2.37%

Dividends

VOO vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than MCD's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.58%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and MCD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCD has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs MCD's -73.20%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and MCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer