PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 27.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 15.72%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.


VOO

1D
1.74%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.51%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.72%

IGM

1D
3.64%
1M
7.10%
YTD
27.92%
6M
29.29%
1Y
56.16%
3Y*
36.48%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
25.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.99%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
27.92%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and IGM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.89

The correlation between VOO and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
IGM

Technology

35.6%
85.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.3%

Communication Services

11.1%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.0%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.2%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.6%
IGM
85.2%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
IGM
0.3%

Communication Services

VOO
11.1%
IGM
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.1%
IGM
0.0%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
IGM

-

Industrials

VOO
8.0%
IGM
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
IGM

-

Energy

VOO
3.5%
IGM
0.2%

Utilities

VOO
2.8%
IGM

-

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
IGM

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
IGM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.43

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

11.62

+2.63

VOO vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-65.59%

+31.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.44%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-26.39%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-40.68%

+16.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-40.68%

+6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-3.41%

+2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-15.22%

+11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

4.85%

-2.88%

Volatility

VOO vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.61%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

10.54%

-5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

18.42%

-8.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

22.24%

-9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

25.97%

-9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

24.70%

-6.65%

VOO vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than IGM's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.17%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and IGM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGM has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to VOO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.12% vs 15.72% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 15.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.17% for IGM.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IGM is Technology Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.39% for IGM.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer