VOO vs. HIDR.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and HIDR.L (HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HIDR.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs -3.29%/yr for HIDR.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIDR.L.

Performance

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while HIDR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HIDR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than HIDR.L's -36.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed HIDR.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while HIDR.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.29% annualized return.

VOO

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 9.08%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 25.76%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

HIDR.L

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -10.86%
• YTD: -36.24%
• 6M: -36.19%
• 1Y: -37.53%
• 3Y*: -19.81%
• 5Y*: -8.95%
• 10Y*: -3.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.08%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD	-36.24%	-1.20%	-14.61%	4.43%	3.09%	1.47%	-8.00%	8.24%	-9.58%	23.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and HIDR.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011	0.36

The correlation between VOO and HIDR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	HIDR.L
Technology	35.7%	3.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	56.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.2%
Energy	3.5%	1.7%
Utilities	2.4%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	12.8%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. HIDR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 70
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

HIDR.L

HIDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HIDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HIDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HIDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HIDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOO	HIDR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	-1.37	+3.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	-2.04	+4.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.74	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	-0.79	+3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.42	-2.30	+14.72

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and HIDR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum HIDR.L drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and HIDR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	HIDR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-58.15%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-48.66%	+39.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-58.13%	+39.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-58.13%	+33.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	-58.13%	+24.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-50.90%	+48.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-18.92%	+15.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	16.73%	-14.76%

Volatility

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	HIDR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	15.37%	-11.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.58%	24.62%	-15.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	28.01%	-15.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	21.84%	-4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	24.76%	-6.73%

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. HIDR.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than HIDR.L's 5.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD	5.93%	4.87%	3.49%	3.49%	2.04%	1.27%	1.75%	1.62%	1.50%	1.14%	1.12%	1.59%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and HIDR.L in my portfolio?

VOO and HIDR.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOO or HIDR.L?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or HIDR.L?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDR.L.

What is the main difference between VOO and HIDR.L?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while HIDR.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.50% for HIDR.L.