PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. HAUZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed HAUZ with an annualized return of 14.98%, while HAUZ has yielded a comparatively lower 3.22% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.90%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
14.77%

HAUZ

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.65%
6M
-4.19%
YTD
-0.35%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
3.22%
ALL TIME*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.44%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-0.35%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%20.89%-9.12%27.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and HAUZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.53

The correlation between VOO and HAUZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOHAUZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.08

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.38

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

0.87

+8.76

VOO vs. HAUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the HAUZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and HAUZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum HAUZ drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and HAUZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOHAUZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-39.51%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-14.08%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-17.88%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-34.14%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-39.51%

+5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-9.66%

+7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-11.74%

+8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

6.05%

-4.01%

Volatility

VOO vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOHAUZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.31%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

11.99%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

14.13%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

15.95%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.95%

+1.05%

VOO vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than HAUZ's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
3.57%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and HAUZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to HAUZ (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs HAUZ's -39.51%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.98% vs 3.22% for HAUZ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HAUZ.

HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.08% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while HAUZ is REIT. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.10% for HAUZ.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and HAUZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer