PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 7.59% return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

FDVV

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.68%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.85%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
7.59%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and FDVV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.88

The correlation between VOO and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
FDVV

Technology

35.7%
29.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
17.0%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
13.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
3.1%

Industrials

8.3%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.7%
FDVV
29.1%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
FDVV
17.0%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
FDVV
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
FDVV
13.6%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
FDVV
3.1%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
FDVV
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
FDVV
11.0%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
FDVV

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
FDVV
8.7%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
FDVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
FDVV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.41

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

10.00

+2.97

VOO vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.23

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.79

+0.09

Drawdowns

VOO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-40.25%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.30%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-15.90%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-20.18%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.85%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.80%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.24%

-0.32%

Volatility

VOO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.96%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.96%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

8.08%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

10.07%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

14.75%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

16.99%

+1.04%

VOO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FDVV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.74%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.49% vs 13.25% for FDVV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.49% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer