VOO vs. FBGRX
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 21.66%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.
Performance
VOO vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.50%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.66% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
FBGRX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 36.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- 21.66%
VOO vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 13.86% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and FBGRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VOO and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
FBGRX
VOO vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.95 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 12.23 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -58.64% | +24.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -12.65% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -27.07% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -43.08% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -43.08% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -3.97% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -12.52% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.05% | -1.08% |
Volatility
VOO vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 6.86% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 14.15% | -4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 18.25% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 24.99% | -8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 23.74% | -5.71% |
VOO vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FBGRX's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.67% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VOO and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBGRX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.
FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer