VOO vs. ACWI
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for ACWI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
VOO vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 15.50%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.02% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
VOO vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 10.59% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and ACWI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VOO and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
ACWI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
ACWI
Financial Services
VOO
ACWI
Communication Services
VOO
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
ACWI
Healthcare
VOO
ACWI
Industrials
VOO
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
VOO
ACWI
Energy
VOO
ACWI
Utilities
VOO
ACWI
Real Estate
VOO
ACWI
Basic Materials
VOO
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
ACWI
VOO vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.62 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 11.46 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -56.00% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.73% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -16.55% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -26.42% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -33.53% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -2.19% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -8.60% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.22% | -0.25% |
Volatility
VOO vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.17% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 11.09% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 13.42% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.15% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.14% | +0.89% |
VOO vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than ACWI's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.40% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VOO and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACWI has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 13.02% for ACWI. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while ACWI is Global Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.32% for ACWI.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer