ACWI vs. SSAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).
ACWI and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both ACWI and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACWI or SSAC.L.
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI and SSAC.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ACWI:
0.63
SSAC.L:
0.25
ACWI:
1.00
SSAC.L:
0.43
ACWI:
1.15
SSAC.L:
1.06
ACWI:
0.68
SSAC.L:
0.20
ACWI:
3.09
SSAC.L:
0.81
ACWI:
3.64%
SSAC.L:
4.44%
ACWI:
17.87%
SSAC.L:
14.40%
ACWI:
-56.00%
SSAC.L:
-25.43%
ACWI:
-6.94%
SSAC.L:
-12.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly higher than SSAC.L's -8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has underperformed SSAC.L with an annualized return of 8.48%, while SSAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
ACWI
-1.69%
-3.56%
-2.10%
10.10%
13.55%
8.48%
SSAC.L
-8.50%
-6.59%
-5.12%
2.30%
11.97%
9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACWI vs. SSAC.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ACWI
SSAC.L
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while SSAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.73% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than SSAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and SSAC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACWI vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) at 11.19%. This indicates that ACWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.