PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 16.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.68%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.


VONV

1D
0.38%
1M
2.02%
6M
15.40%
YTD
20.63%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
12.10%

VTV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.36%
6M
11.27%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
12.57%
ALL TIME*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$67.85M$88.58M$94.83M
$688.19M$688.42M$619.05M

VONV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
20.63%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.37%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VTV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VONV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VTV

Technology

19.9%
15.3%

Financial Services

18.6%
22.4%

Healthcare

12.7%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
3.9%

Industrials

10.5%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.7%

Energy

5.5%
6.9%

Utilities

3.9%
4.8%

Real Estate

3.8%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.9%

Technology

VONV
19.9%
VTV
15.3%

Financial Services

VONV
18.6%
VTV
22.4%

Healthcare

VONV
12.7%
VTV
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
10.9%
VTV
3.9%

Industrials

VONV
10.5%
VTV
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.5%
VTV
8.7%

Energy

VONV
5.5%
VTV
6.9%

Utilities

VONV
3.9%
VTV
4.8%

Real Estate

VONV
3.8%
VTV
2.5%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.4%
VTV
3.0%

Communication Services

VONV
3.3%
VTV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONVVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

4.24

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.65

16.42

+3.23

VONV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-59.27%

+21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.35%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-14.52%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-17.04%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-36.78%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.36%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-7.82%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.64%

-0.05%

Volatility

VONV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.62%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

7.72%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

10.36%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

13.82%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.61%

+0.59%

VONV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.56%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VONV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.57% vs 11.68% for VONV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.56% for VONV.

VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.04% for VTV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer