PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VONV vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VONV vs. BND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONV returned 11.35%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. VONV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

VONV vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 11.35%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.

VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

BND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF		14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		0.27%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and BND is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

-0.10

The correlation between VONV and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

Often compared with VONV:
VONV vs. VONGVONV vs. IWDVONV vs. VOOVONV vs. VONEVONV vs. RPVVONV vs. VOEVONV vs. VTI
Often compared with BND:
BND vs. BNDXBND vs. FXNAXBND vs. AGGBND vs. FBNDBND vs. BNDWBND vs. TLTBND vs. VBTLX

Return for Risk

VONV vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VONVBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.64
1.36

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.73
2.03

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.24

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

1.92

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

5.80

+11.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VONV vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VONVBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.36

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.01

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.29

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.59

+0.13

Drawdowns

VONV vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and BND.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VONVBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-18.58%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-2.68%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-5.92%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-17.91%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-18.58%

-19.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.37%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-3.06%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

0.88%

+0.74%

Volatility

VONV vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VONVBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.23%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

2.66%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

3.78%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

6.02%

+8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

5.53%

+11.71%

VONV vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VONV vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF		1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

VONV and BND have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 1.58% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.03% for BND.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer