PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.28%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


VONG

1D
0.39%
1M
-7.09%
YTD
0.56%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
18.28%

TQQQ

1D
-4.16%
1M
-15.05%
YTD
36.47%
6M
30.08%
1Y
77.18%
3Y*
55.74%
5Y*
20.68%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.56%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
36.47%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and TQQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VONG and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
TQQQ

Technology

54.1%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.3%

Communication Services

12.0%
15.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
4.2%

Industrials

4.9%
2.8%

Financial Services

4.8%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
7.7%

Utilities

1.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.1%

Energy

0.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.1%

Technology

VONG
54.1%
TQQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
12.5%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

VONG
12.0%
TQQQ
15.8%

Healthcare

VONG
6.9%
TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

VONG
4.9%
TQQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

VONG
4.8%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.5%
TQQQ
7.7%

Utilities

VONG
1.0%
TQQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
TQQQ
0.1%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
TQQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONGTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.15

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.72

6.75

-4.03

VONG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-81.66%

+48.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-36.97%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-58.04%

+34.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-81.66%

+48.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-81.66%

+48.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.73%

-17.65%

+9.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-18.49%

+13.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

11.72%

-6.68%

Volatility

VONG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 6.08%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

27.08%

-21.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

43.49%

-30.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

53.41%

-37.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

67.42%

-45.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

66.28%

-45.37%

VONG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VONG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than TQQQ's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.29%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.48%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VONG and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.08%) compared to VONG (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 18.28% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.29% for TQQQ.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer