PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 18.32%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively lower 14.83% annualized return.


VONG

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.06%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
18.32%

SCHB

1D
0.35%
1M
0.46%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.03%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
4.12%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
9.14%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and SCHB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VONG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
SCHB

Technology

51.4%
34.4%

Communication Services

13.2%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.9%

Industrials

5.7%
9.4%

Financial Services

5.3%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.4%

Energy

0.4%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.0%

Utilities

0.3%
2.3%

Technology

VONG
51.4%
SCHB
34.4%

Communication Services

VONG
13.2%
SCHB
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
13.2%
SCHB
10.1%

Healthcare

VONG
7.1%
SCHB
8.9%

Industrials

VONG
5.7%
SCHB
9.4%

Financial Services

VONG
5.3%
SCHB
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.7%
SCHB
4.6%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
SCHB
2.4%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
SCHB
3.7%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
SCHB
2.0%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONGSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.81

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

12.80

-8.41

VONG vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONGSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.02

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.72

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.82

+0.06

Drawdowns

VONG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-35.27%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-8.91%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-19.34%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-25.41%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-35.27%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-2.63%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.11%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

1.95%

+2.90%

Volatility

VONG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.93%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

3.93%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

9.57%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

12.41%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

17.28%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

18.34%

+2.56%

VONG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VONG and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to SCHB (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.32% vs 14.83% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer