VONG vs. RAAX
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck. VONG is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VONG returned 14.01%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RAAX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.
Performance
VONG vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than RAAX's 17.64% return.
VONG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.29%
RAAX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
VONG vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 2.96% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.57% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 17.64% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and RAAX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VONG and RAAX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
RAAX
VONG vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONG | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 4.68 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 16.90 | -13.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONG vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, roughly equal to the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and RAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -33.91% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -7.17% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -11.59% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -23.55% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.52% | -3.77% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -6.77% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 1.98% | +2.93% |
Volatility
VONG vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 4.67%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 4.67% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 12.21% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 14.18% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 15.70% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 15.79% | +5.12% |
VONG vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
VONG vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than RAAX's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.99% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONG and RAAX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to RAAX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs RAAX's -33.91%.
On 5-year performance, VONG leads with 14.01% vs 13.17% for RAAX. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VONG has performed better with a 14.01% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.
VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RAAX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.78% for RAAX.
RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and RAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer