PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed EINC with an annualized return of 18.58%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.


VONG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
3.18%
6M
2.49%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
18.58%

EINC

1D
1.33%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
24.27%
6M
25.77%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
3.18%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
24.27%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and EINC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012

0.34

The correlation between VONG and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONG vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
EINC

Technology

54.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

-

Communication Services

12.0%

-

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Industrials

4.9%
2.5%

Financial Services

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Utilities

1.0%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Energy

0.4%
99.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Technology

VONG
54.1%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
12.5%
EINC

-

Communication Services

VONG
12.0%
EINC

-

Healthcare

VONG
6.9%
EINC

-

Industrials

VONG
4.9%
EINC
2.5%

Financial Services

VONG
4.8%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.5%
EINC

-

Utilities

VONG
1.0%
EINC
0.6%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
EINC

-

Energy

VONG
0.4%
EINC
99.4%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONGEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.47

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

8.82

-4.53

VONG vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONG vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and EINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-87.55%

+54.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-7.89%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-16.01%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-19.87%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-68.85%

+36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-5.79%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-44.16%

+39.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

3.09%

+1.86%

Volatility

VONG vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 5.86%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

6.32%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

11.86%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

15.07%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

19.54%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

25.43%

-4.49%

VONG vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VONG vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than EINC's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.56%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.46%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONG and EINC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to VONG (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.58% vs 11.88% for EINC. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.58% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.46% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer