PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 18.61%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and DLN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between VONG and DLN has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VONG vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
DLN

Technology

51.4%
20.1%

Communication Services

13.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
5.0%

Healthcare

7.1%
12.6%

Industrials

5.7%
7.9%

Financial Services

5.3%
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
9.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.0%

Energy

0.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.0%

Utilities

0.3%
5.9%

Technology

VONG
51.4%
DLN
20.1%

Communication Services

VONG
13.2%
DLN
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
13.2%
DLN
5.0%

Healthcare

VONG
7.1%
DLN
12.6%

Industrials

VONG
5.7%
DLN
7.9%

Financial Services

VONG
5.3%
DLN
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.7%
DLN
9.3%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
DLN
4.0%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
DLN
8.5%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
DLN
1.0%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
DLN
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONGDLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

2.53

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

3.64

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.69

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.34

15.59

-10.25

VONG vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONGDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.53

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.93

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.53

+0.37

Drawdowns

VONG vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-57.84%

+25.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-6.10%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-13.71%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-16.26%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-35.82%

+3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.51%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-7.52%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

1.44%

+3.39%

Volatility

VONG vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.17%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

6.77%

+4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

8.87%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

13.26%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

16.16%

+4.71%

VONG vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VONG vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONG and DLN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.61% vs 12.68% for DLN. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer