PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VONE vs. ACEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VONE vs. ACEP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026
Documentation

VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VONE is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.

Performance

VONE vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.

VONE

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.26%
6M
12.61%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
15.05%
ALL TIME*
14.61%

ACEP

1D
0.02%
1M
2.51%
6M
15.44%
YTD
24.65%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
$36.53K$36.84K$48.24K

VONE

Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
$25.73M$27.06M$30.27M

VONE vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF		13.29%4.97%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF		24.65%8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and ACEP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.79

VONE vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VONE
ACEP

Technology

36.6%
34.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.4%

Industrials

9.8%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
2.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
1.2%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
1.9%

Energy

3.1%
12.5%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.1%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
11.1%

Technology

VONE
36.6%
ACEP
34.3%

Financial Services

VONE
11.6%
ACEP
14.4%

Industrials

VONE
9.8%
ACEP
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VONE
9.6%
ACEP
2.8%

Communication Services

VONE
9.6%
ACEP
1.2%

Healthcare

VONE
9.1%
ACEP
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

VONE
4.4%
ACEP
1.9%

Energy

VONE
3.1%
ACEP
12.5%

Utilities

VONE
2.2%
ACEP

-

Real Estate

VONE
2.1%
ACEP
1.6%

Basic Materials

VONE
1.9%
ACEP
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

Often compared with VONE:
VONE vs. VONGVONE vs. VOOVONE vs. IWBVONE vs. VONVVONE vs. SPYVONE vs. VTHRVONE vs. VWUSX
Often compared with ACEP:
ACEP vs. AFOSACEP vs. GXLCACEP vs. FNDBACEP vs. NRSHACEP vs. PSCXACEP vs. UJUNACEP vs. CNAV

Return for Risk

VONE vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
ACEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONE vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VONEACEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.53

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

—

—

VONE vs. ACEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONE vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and ACEP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VONEACEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-7.06%

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.44%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-1.74%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

—

—

Volatility

VONE vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VONEACEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

16.86%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.86%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

16.86%

+1.40%

VONE vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONE vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF		0.11%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF		0.99%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

VONE and ACEP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.45% for ACEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONE and ACEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer