PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOLT vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOLT vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 71.50% return.


VOLT

1D
1.62%
1M
-8.10%
6M
15.18%
YTD
28.30%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.26%

LRCX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-25.11%
6M
25.75%
YTD
71.50%
1Y
210.67%
3Y*
61.40%
5Y*
37.09%
10Y*
43.64%
ALL TIME*
23.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.65B$3.82B$3.92B
$11.21M$11.77M$15.67M

VOLT vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
28.30%25.92%-8.98%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
71.50%139.16%-7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and LRCX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.69

The correlation between VOLT and LRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOLT vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOLT vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOLTLRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

5.08

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

21.44

-13.29

VOLT vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOLTLRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-87.90%

+64.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-41.76%

+24.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-32.38%

+20.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-28.13%

+22.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

9.87%

-5.37%

Volatility

VOLT vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) is 9.95%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 27.34%. This indicates that VOLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOLTLRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

27.34%

-17.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.11%

52.39%

-31.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.43%

63.10%

-38.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.46%

48.97%

-23.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

46.20%

-20.74%

Dividends

VOLT vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than LRCX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.35%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.36%0.46%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOLT and LRCX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRCX has higher volatility (27.34%) compared to VOLT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOLT and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer