VOLT vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. VOLT is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, VOLT returned 64.21% vs 25.06% for ENFR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOLT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

VOLT vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 23.18% return.

VOLT

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 41.30%
• 6M: 38.97%
• 1Y: 64.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 23.40%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLT vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	41.30%	25.92%	-8.98%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.18%	5.88%	-3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and ENFR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between VOLT and ENFR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOLT vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOLT	ENFR
Industrials	47.0%	3.4%
Utilities	31.0%	1.4%
Technology	12.9%	-
Energy	4.7%	98.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	-
Financial Services	0.5%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

VOLT vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 91
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 55
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOLT	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	1.69	+1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	2.35	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.29	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.73	2.91	+3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.83	7.39	+11.43

VOLT vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLT	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-68.28%	+44.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-8.64%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-6.04%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-15.93%	+10.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	3.40%	+0.02%

Volatility

VOLT vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.68%. This indicates that VOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOLT	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.34%	5.68%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.28%	11.71%	+6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.74%	14.91%	+6.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.53%	19.26%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.53%	24.68%	-0.15%

VOLT vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLT vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ENFR's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.07%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.32%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLT and ENFR in my portfolio?

VOLT and ENFR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOLT or ENFR?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to ENFR (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, VOLT or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 64.21% vs 25.06% for ENFR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOLT or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 64.21% return vs 25.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOLT or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOLT or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.32% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between VOLT and ENFR?

VOLT is categorized as Global Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VOLT and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.