PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 10.57%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.84% annualized return.


VOE

1D
0.20%
1M
3.58%
6M
11.63%
YTD
15.00%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
10.57%
ALL TIME*
9.49%

MUB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.81%
6M
0.60%
YTD
0.72%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
1.84%
ALL TIME*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.00%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
0.72%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.02%5.12%7.06%0.93%4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and MUB is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007

-0.04

The correlation between VOE and MUB shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOEMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.11

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

7.36

+5.76

VOE vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOE vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-13.68%

-47.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-2.79%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-5.25%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-11.80%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-13.68%

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.30%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-2.22%

-6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.80%

+1.02%

Volatility

VOE vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 0.64%. This indicates that VOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

0.64%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

2.32%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

2.90%

+8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

4.07%

+11.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

4.90%

+13.83%

VOE vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than MUB's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.21%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.84%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOE and MUB have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOE has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to MUB (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs MUB's -13.68%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.57% vs 1.84% for MUB. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 1.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for MUB.

MUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 1.84% for VOE.

VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while MUB is Municipal Bonds. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.07% for MUB.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer