PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. AVMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. AVMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly lower than AVMV's 13.85% return.


VOE

1D
0.55%
1M
1.98%
YTD
12.36%
6M
11.18%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.02%

AVMV

1D
0.84%
1M
2.42%
YTD
13.85%
6M
12.10%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. AVMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
12.36%12.08%14.00%12.46%
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
13.85%10.46%18.43%14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and AVMV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.92

The correlation between VOE and AVMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOE vs. AVMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
AVMV

Financial Services

16.6%
22.4%

Industrials

13.6%
16.2%

Energy

12.3%
13.3%

Utilities

11.6%
0.6%

Technology

11.4%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.3%

Healthcare

6.4%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
18.5%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.9%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.8%

Communication Services

2.1%
1.6%

Financial Services

VOE
16.6%
AVMV
22.4%

Industrials

VOE
13.6%
AVMV
16.2%

Energy

VOE
12.3%
AVMV
13.3%

Utilities

VOE
11.6%
AVMV
0.6%

Technology

VOE
11.4%
AVMV
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
AVMV
7.3%

Healthcare

VOE
6.4%
AVMV
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
6.2%
AVMV
18.5%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.9%
AVMV
3.9%

Real Estate

VOE
5.6%
AVMV
0.8%

Communication Services

VOE
2.1%
AVMV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. AVMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. AVMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOEAVMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.38

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

11.07

+1.58

VOE vs. AVMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the AVMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and AVMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOE vs. AVMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than AVMV's maximum drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and AVMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEAVMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-24.24%

-37.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.63%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.65%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-3.82%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.32%

-0.49%

Volatility

VOE vs. AVMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 3.29%, while Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEAVMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.77%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

9.72%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

14.07%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.93%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.93%

+0.86%

VOE vs. AVMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AVMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. AVMV - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than AVMV's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.05%1.20%1.30%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.85%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VOE and AVMV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVMV has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to VOE (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs AVMV's -24.24%.

On 1-year performance, AVMV leads with 25.63% vs 23.06% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMV has performed better with a 25.63% return vs 23.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AVMV.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.05% for AVMV.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.20% for AVMV.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and AVMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer