PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNRT.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 9.37% return.


VNRT.L

1D
0.87%
1M
1.27%
YTD
10.33%
6M
10.50%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
15.46%

FUQA.L

1D
1.00%
1M
1.72%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.76%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
10.33%9.94%27.04%19.99%-9.99%28.98%15.41%26.41%-0.83%7.29%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.37%8.56%19.50%11.85%-0.00%27.82%8.23%27.23%1.10%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRT.L and FUQA.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.90

The correlation between VNRT.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRT.L
FUQA.L

Technology

34.4%
37.1%

Financial Services

13.0%
12.4%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Energy

4.3%
3.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

VNRT.L
34.4%
FUQA.L
37.1%

Financial Services

VNRT.L
13.0%
FUQA.L
12.4%

Communication Services

VNRT.L
10.9%
FUQA.L
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRT.L
9.8%
FUQA.L
9.3%

Industrials

VNRT.L
8.3%
FUQA.L
8.7%

Healthcare

VNRT.L
8.2%
FUQA.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

VNRT.L
4.7%
FUQA.L
4.5%

Energy

VNRT.L
4.3%
FUQA.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

VNRT.L
2.4%
FUQA.L
2.2%

Utilities

VNRT.L
2.3%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Real Estate

VNRT.L
1.8%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRT.L
VNRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNRT.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.24

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

17.02

-3.93

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRT.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRT.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.18%

-27.34%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-6.01%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-20.49%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-20.49%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-7.08%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.50%

+0.57%

Volatility

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that VNRT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRT.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.63%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

6.73%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

9.53%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

19.12%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

22.41%

-6.94%

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

VNRT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
0.89%0.96%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.02%1.43%1.48%1.75%1.61%1.51%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VNRT.L and FUQA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer