VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L
VNRT.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VNRT.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNRT.L returned 13.69%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for FUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VNRT.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.
Performance
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VNRT.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 9.37% return.
VNRT.L
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
FUQA.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- —
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 10.33% | 9.94% | 27.04% | 19.99% | -9.99% | 28.98% | 15.41% | 26.41% | -0.83% | 7.29% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 9.37% | 8.56% | 19.50% | 11.85% | -0.00% | 27.82% | 8.23% | 27.23% | 1.10% | -13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRT.L and FUQA.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VNRT.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Financial Services
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Communication Services
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Industrials
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Healthcare
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Energy
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Basic Materials
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Utilities
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Real Estate
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNRT.L
FUQA.L
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNRT.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.24 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 17.02 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and FUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRT.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -27.34% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -6.01% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -20.49% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -20.49% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -7.08% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.50% | +0.57% |
Volatility
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that VNRT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRT.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 2.63% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 6.73% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 9.53% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 19.12% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 22.41% | -6.94% |
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRT.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
VNRT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 0.89% | 0.96% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.61% | 1.51% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VNRT.L and FUQA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.
VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and FUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer