PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNRT.L is traded in GBP, while IUSA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than IUSA.L's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VNRT.L has underperformed IUSA.L with an annualized return of 15.64%, while IUSA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.


VNRT.L

1D
0.13%
1M
5.67%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.64%

IUSA.L

1D
0.04%
1M
5.55%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.66%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
10.09%8.77%26.36%19.99%-9.98%28.99%15.42%26.39%-0.82%10.67%
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
10.67%9.70%27.73%20.24%-8.72%31.54%14.15%27.06%0.51%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRT.L and IUSA.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between VNRT.L and IUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRT.L
IUSA.L

Technology

34.4%
38.2%

Financial Services

13.0%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.0%

Industrials

8.3%
7.9%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Energy

4.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

VNRT.L
34.4%
IUSA.L
38.2%

Financial Services

VNRT.L
13.0%
IUSA.L
11.1%

Communication Services

VNRT.L
10.9%
IUSA.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRT.L
9.8%
IUSA.L
10.0%

Industrials

VNRT.L
8.3%
IUSA.L
7.9%

Healthcare

VNRT.L
8.2%
IUSA.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VNRT.L
4.7%
IUSA.L
4.7%

Energy

VNRT.L
4.3%
IUSA.L
3.2%

Basic Materials

VNRT.L
2.4%
IUSA.L
1.7%

Utilities

VNRT.L
2.3%
IUSA.L
2.2%

Real Estate

VNRT.L
1.8%
IUSA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRT.L
VNRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSA.L
IUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNRT.LIUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.53

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.20

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

15.53

-2.97

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRT.L and IUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNRT.LIUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.82

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.07

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

1.06

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.58

+0.38

Drawdowns

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.L drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and IUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRT.LIUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-38.58%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-7.01%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-21.08%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-21.08%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.17%

-25.42%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.22%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-7.29%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.90%

+0.28%

Volatility

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRT.LIUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.62%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.13%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

10.44%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

14.33%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

15.60%

-0.05%

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRT.L vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

VNRT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
1.15%1.24%1.28%1.55%1.74%1.39%1.80%1.96%2.22%1.95%1.75%2.29%
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.24%1.41%1.02%1.43%1.48%1.76%1.61%1.51%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VNRT.L and IUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRT.L.

VNRT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUSA.L is S&P 500. VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.07% for IUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and IUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer