PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQI vs. VOTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQI vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than VOTE's 11.51% return.


VNQI

1D
0.45%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
-1.57%
10Y*
2.21%

VOTE

1D
0.44%
1M
4.81%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.46%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-2.14%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%-2.44%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
11.51%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%12.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and VOTE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.58

The correlation between VNQI and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQI vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQI
VOTE

Real Estate

91.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

1.9%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
10.2%

Industrials

0.7%
8.5%

Energy

0.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.8%

Technology

0.2%
35.5%

Utilities

0.1%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
4.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.6%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Real Estate

VNQI
91.2%
VOTE
1.8%

Financial Services

VNQI
1.9%
VOTE
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQI
1.1%
VOTE
10.2%

Industrials

VNQI
0.7%
VOTE
8.5%

Energy

VNQI
0.3%
VOTE
3.6%

Basic Materials

VNQI
0.3%
VOTE
1.8%

Technology

VNQI
0.2%
VOTE
35.5%

Utilities

VNQI
0.1%
VOTE
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VNQI
0.1%
VOTE
4.8%

Healthcare

VNQI
0.0%
VOTE
8.6%

Communication Services

VNQI

-

VOTE
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQI vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQIVOTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.16

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

14.50

-13.33

VNQI vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQIVOTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

2.38

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.81

-0.61

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than VOTE's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and VOTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQIVOTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-25.71%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-9.10%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-19.08%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.62%

-0.27%

-11.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-6.14%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

1.98%

+2.86%

Volatility

VNQI vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) at 2.91%. This indicates that VNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQIVOTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

2.91%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

9.20%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

12.08%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

17.14%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.14%

-1.08%

VNQI vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQI vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VOTE's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.81%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
0.89%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQI and VOTE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQI has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to VOTE (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 23.05% vs 8.33% for VNQI. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 23.05% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VNQI.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.89% for VOTE.

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while VOTE is Large Cap Blend Equities. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.05% for VOTE.

VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQI and VOTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer