PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 5.21%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.75%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
5.21%

VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
7.83%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and VWO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

0.51

The correlation between VNQ and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNQ vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQ
VWO

Real Estate

97.3%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
8.0%

Communication Services

0.6%
7.1%

Technology

0.3%
29.6%

Energy

0.1%
4.6%

Financial Services

0.1%
19.5%

Industrials

0.0%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
VWO
2.2%

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
VWO
8.0%

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
VWO
7.1%

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
VWO
29.6%

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
VWO
4.6%

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
VWO
19.5%

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

VWO
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

VWO
3.7%

Healthcare

VNQ

-

VWO
3.9%

Utilities

VNQ

-

VWO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQVWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.94

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

2.69

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.36

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.76

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.78

9.96

-6.18

VNQ vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.94

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.30

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.46

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.27

0.00

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than VWO's maximum drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-67.68%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-11.17%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-17.37%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-32.64%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-36.39%

-6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-1.41%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-15.82%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.09%

-0.45%

Volatility

VNQ vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 3.72%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

5.61%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

13.22%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

15.89%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

17.37%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

19.20%

+1.50%

VNQ vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQ vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than VWO's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and VWO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VNQ (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 8.85% vs 5.21% for VNQ. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.40% for VWO.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.08% for VWO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer