PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. IFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 19.25% return.


VNQ

1D
1.31%
1M
1.13%
YTD
11.77%
6M
12.16%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
5.44%

IFRA

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.48%
YTD
19.25%
6M
17.89%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.77%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%1.79%
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
19.25%15.90%17.02%13.42%-3.32%29.81%7.37%27.00%-7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and IFRA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.67

The correlation between VNQ and IFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IFRA
IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNQIFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.69

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

13.48

-9.11

VNQ vs. IFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the IFRA Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and IFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and IFRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQIFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-41.06%

-32.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.40%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-19.93%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-19.93%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.86%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-5.12%

-8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.29%

+0.37%

Volatility

VNQ vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQIFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.19%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

11.76%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

15.21%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

17.91%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

21.36%

-0.61%

VNQ vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNQ vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than IFRA's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
1.56%1.84%1.75%1.98%1.98%1.63%2.08%1.68%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.56%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and IFRA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFRA has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to VNQ (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs IFRA's -41.06%.

On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 14.07% vs 2.83% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 14.07% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.56% for IFRA.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while IFRA is Industrials Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.30% for IFRA.

IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and IFRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer