VNQ vs. EEM
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.22%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for EEM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
VNQ vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 29.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 5.22%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
EEM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- YTD
- 29.41%
- 6M
- 32.25%
- 1Y
- 58.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
VNQ vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 7.96% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 29.41% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and EEM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and EEM has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VNQ vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
EEM
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
EEM
Basic Materials
VNQ
EEM
Communication Services
VNQ
EEM
Technology
VNQ
EEM
Energy
VNQ
EEM
Financial Services
VNQ
EEM
Industrials
VNQ
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
EEM
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
EEM
Healthcare
VNQ
-
EEM
Utilities
VNQ
-
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
EEM
VNQ vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNQ | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 2.93 | -2.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 3.75 | -2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.53 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 4.39 | -3.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 16.94 | -13.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNQ | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.93 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.40 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -66.43% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -13.52% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -17.29% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -37.71% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -39.82% | -2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | 0.00% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -16.02% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.50% | -0.86% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 3.77%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 8.36% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 17.36% | -8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 19.93% | -6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 18.91% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 20.50% | +0.20% |
VNQ vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNQ vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than EEM's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.69% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and EEM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to VNQ (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 10.06% vs 5.22% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.72% for EEM.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer