PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 29.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 5.22%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.15%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
5.22%

EEM

1D
1.03%
1M
10.40%
YTD
29.41%
6M
32.25%
1Y
58.14%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
7.96%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
29.41%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and EEM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and EEM has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VNQ vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQ
EEM

Real Estate

97.3%
0.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
6.1%

Communication Services

0.6%
5.7%

Technology

0.3%
43.6%

Energy

0.1%
3.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
17.5%

Industrials

0.0%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.7%

Healthcare

-

2.5%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
EEM
0.9%

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
EEM
6.1%

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
EEM
5.7%

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
EEM
43.6%

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
EEM
3.3%

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
EEM
17.5%

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
EEM
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

EEM
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

EEM
2.7%

Healthcare

VNQ

-

EEM
2.5%

Utilities

VNQ

-

EEM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQEEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

2.93

-2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

3.75

-2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.53

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

4.39

-3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

16.94

-13.14

VNQ vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.93

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.40

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.49

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.38

-0.12

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-66.43%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-13.52%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-17.29%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-37.71%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-39.82%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

0.00%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-16.02%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.50%

-0.86%

Volatility

VNQ vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 3.77%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

8.36%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

17.36%

-8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

19.93%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

18.91%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

20.50%

+0.20%

VNQ vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNQ vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than EEM's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.72%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and EEM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to VNQ (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 10.06% vs 5.22% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.72% for EEM.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer