VNQ vs. BCHS.L
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while BCHS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNQ returned 2.38%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for BCHS.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHS.L.
Performance
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VNQ is traded in USD, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 16.86% return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
BCHS.L
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 42.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.86%
- 10Y*
- —
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.56% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 14.75% |
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 16.86% | 45.45% | 16.53% | 66.63% | -52.00% | 24.86% | 94.85% | -10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and BCHS.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between VNQ and BCHS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
BCHS.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
BCHS.L
Basic Materials
VNQ
BCHS.L
Communication Services
VNQ
BCHS.L
Technology
VNQ
BCHS.L
Energy
VNQ
BCHS.L
Financial Services
VNQ
BCHS.L
Industrials
VNQ
BCHS.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
BCHS.L
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
BCHS.L
Healthcare
VNQ
-
BCHS.L
Utilities
VNQ
-
BCHS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
BCHS.L
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNQ | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 2.95 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNQ | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.09 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.25 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than BCHS.L's maximum drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and BCHS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -61.43% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -30.45% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -35.24% | +17.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -60.92% | +26.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -11.37% | +10.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -26.10% | +12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 14.61% | -11.96% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 12.70% | -7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 27.25% | -17.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 39.32% | -25.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 39.82% | -20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 38.12% | -17.40% |
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNQ vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and BCHS.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while BCHS.L is Technology Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.65% for BCHS.L.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and BCHS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer