VNO vs. GDXJ
VNO (Vornado Realty Trust) is a stock, while GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Over the past 10 years, VNO returned -3.63%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VNO vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNO achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VNO has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of -3.63%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
VNO
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.06%
- 5Y*
- -3.27%
- 10Y*
- -3.63%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
VNO vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | 8.77% | -19.09% | 51.32% | 39.50% | -46.66% | 17.78% | -40.43% | 14.93% | -17.75% | -4.53% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNO and GDXJ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNO vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
VNO
GDXJ
VNO vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNO | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.43 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 3.72 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNO | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 1.00 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.39 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.26 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.05 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
VNO vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNO drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNO and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNO | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -88.66% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.22% | -35.60% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.88% | -35.60% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.46% | -50.99% | -21.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.89% | -57.77% | -23.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.31% | -34.94% | -6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -60.48% | +39.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.24% | 13.67% | +7.57% |
Volatility
VNO vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is 10.04%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that VNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNO | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 17.66% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.04% | 42.71% | -19.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 50.84% | -18.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.61% | 41.34% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.11% | 44.15% | -5.04% |
Dividends
VNO vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
VNO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than GDXJ's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | 2.04% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 2.39% | 10.19% | 5.06% | 6.37% | 6.90% | 4.06% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 14.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNO and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to VNO (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNO dropped -80.89% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNO and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer