VNMC vs. RUNN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VNMC (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF) and RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNMC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RUNN.

Performance

VNMC vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VNMC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: -3.00%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: -1.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNMC vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	10.34%	13.94%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-3.00%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VNMC and RUNN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023	0.45

VNMC vs. RUNN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNMC	RUNN
Industrials	24.0%	39.4%
Financial Services	16.9%	12.8%
Technology	15.6%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	8.3%
Basic Materials	10.2%	2.0%
Healthcare	7.6%	13.3%
Energy	5.9%	-
Real Estate	4.6%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

VNMC vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 7
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNMC vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VNMC	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.68	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VNMC	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.83%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.89%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.54%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VNMC	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.85%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.81%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.81%	—

VNMC vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNMC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNMC vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RUNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	1.08%	4.30%	10.12%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNMC and RUNN in my portfolio?

VNMC and RUNN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VNMC or RUNN?

On fees, RUNN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNMC or RUNN?

RUNN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNMC or RUNN?

RUNN has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.

What is the main difference between VNMC and RUNN?

They also come from different issuers: Groupe BPCE and Running Oak Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VNMC and 0.58% for RUNN.