VNMC vs. MOO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

VNMC (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Natixis, while MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. VNMC is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VNMC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MOO.

Performance

VNMC vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VNMC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MOO

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 1.76%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 1Y: 16.07%
• 3Y*: 0.90%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: 7.40%
• ALL TIME*: 5.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	$14.26M	$13.98M	$22.17M

VNMC vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	10.34%	16.92%	-10.74%	21.59%	19.73%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	12.27%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-8.10%	23.99%	15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VNMC and MOO is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020	0.61

The correlation between VNMC and MOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VNMC vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VNMC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 41
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VNMC vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNMC	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.60	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VNMC	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-69.53%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-15.87%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.97%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VNMC	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.29%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.18%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.14%	—

VNMC vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNMC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNMC vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.20%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	1.08%	4.30%	10.12%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNMC and MOO in my portfolio?

VNMC and MOO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VNMC or MOO?

On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNMC or MOO?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNMC or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.

What is the main difference between VNMC and MOO?

VNMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VNMC and 0.56% for MOO.