VNMC vs. QIDX
VNMC (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. VNMC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.
Performance
VNMC vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VNMC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QIDX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VNMC vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 8.81% | 6.60% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNMC vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank
VNMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QIDX
VNMC vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNMC | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNMC vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNMC | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -14.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.40% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.23% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
VNMC vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNMC | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.51% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.51% | — |
VNMC vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNMC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNMC vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison
VNMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 0.85% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 1.08% | 4.30% | 10.12% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.
QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for VNMC.
They also come from different issuers: Groupe BPCE and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VNMC and 0.50% for QIDX.
Find the right allocation for VNMC and QIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer