PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNLA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNLA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


VNLA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNLA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
1.43%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.17%-0.18%3.01%4.43%0.02%2.11%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VNLA and VOO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2016

0.05

Over the past year, VNLA and VOO have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VNLA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNLA
VOO

Energy

66.7%
3.5%

Industrials

33.3%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Energy

VNLA
66.7%
VOO
3.5%

Industrials

VNLA
33.3%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

VNLA

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

VNLA

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VNLA

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

VNLA

-

VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

VNLA

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

VNLA

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

VNLA

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

VNLA

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

VNLA

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNLA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNLA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNLAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.58

1.43

+2.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.15

3.16

+7.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.27

14.73

+42.55

VNLA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNLA Sharpe Ratio is 7.55, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNLA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNLAVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55

2.39

+5.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.66

0.83

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

0.89

+1.21

Drawdowns

VNLA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNLAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-33.99%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-8.90%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.49%

-18.69%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

-24.52%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.70%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-3.69%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

1.91%

-1.83%

Volatility

VNLA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.18%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNLAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

2.84%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.46%

8.90%

-8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

11.80%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.04%

16.81%

-15.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

18.01%

-16.59%

VNLA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNLA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNLA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.78%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNLA and VOO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNLA dropped -4.49% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 3.79% for VNLA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VNLA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VOO is S&P 500. VNLA tracks FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VNLA and 0.03% for VOO.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNLA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer