PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNIE vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNIE vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNIE achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.90% return.


VNIE

1D
-3.53%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.99%
1Y
-2.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.76%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNIE vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VNIE and CAOS is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNIE vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNIE
VNIE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VNIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNIE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VNIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNIE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNIE vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNIECAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.26

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

2.57

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

6.37

-6.81

VNIE vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNIE Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNIE and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNIECAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.27

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.21

-1.21

Drawdowns

VNIE vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNIE drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNIE and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNIECAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-3.60%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-0.76%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-0.99%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-0.90%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

0.30%

+4.85%

Volatility

VNIE vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.27%. This indicates that VNIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNIECAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

0.27%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

1.03%

+13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

1.53%

+14.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

4.25%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

4.25%

+11.28%

VNIE vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNIE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNIE vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

VNIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNIE and CAOS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNIE has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to CAOS (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNIE dropped -13.11% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

On 1-year performance, CAOS leads with 1.97% vs -2.11% for VNIE. On fees, VNIE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CAOS has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNIE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

VNIE has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

VNIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Vontobel and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VNIE and 0.63% for CAOS.

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNIE and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer