PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMVFX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMVFX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 19.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VMVFX has underperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


VMVFX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.99%
6M
8.43%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
9.46%

VGPMX

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.56%
YTD
19.46%
6M
24.26%
1Y
63.99%
3Y*
30.93%
5Y*
19.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
7.99%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
19.46%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VMVFX and VGPMX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.45

The correlation between VMVFX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMVFX
VGPMX

Technology

20.9%
9.5%

Financial Services

12.8%
5.7%

Healthcare

12.8%
11.9%

Industrials

11.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
9.4%

Communication Services

9.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.1%

Utilities

7.1%
4.7%

Energy

4.3%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%
38.0%

Technology

VMVFX
20.9%
VGPMX
9.5%

Financial Services

VMVFX
12.8%
VGPMX
5.7%

Healthcare

VMVFX
12.8%
VGPMX
11.9%

Industrials

VMVFX
11.4%
VGPMX
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

VMVFX
10.1%
VGPMX
9.4%

Communication Services

VMVFX
9.8%
VGPMX
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMVFX
7.9%
VGPMX
5.1%

Utilities

VMVFX
7.1%
VGPMX
4.7%

Energy

VMVFX
4.3%
VGPMX
4.4%

Real Estate

VMVFX
2.8%
VGPMX
2.2%

Basic Materials

VMVFX
0.2%
VGPMX
38.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMVFX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMVFXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.66

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

5.07

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

21.13

-13.21

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMVFX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMVFXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

3.86

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.16

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.55

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.26

+0.55

Drawdowns

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMVFX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMVFX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMVFXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-78.85%

+45.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-12.80%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.96%

-14.63%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-22.71%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.09%

-54.59%

+21.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.39%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-34.55%

+31.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.06%

-1.46%

Volatility

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) is 1.98%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that VMVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMVFXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

6.17%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

13.92%

-8.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

16.79%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

17.39%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

20.87%

-8.39%

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMVFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMVFX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

VMVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than VGPMX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.27%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.24%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMVFX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to VMVFX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMVFX dropped -33.09% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMVFX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer