PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMRXX vs. ONEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMRXX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than ONEV's 6.35% return.


VMRXX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*

ONEV

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.35%
YTD
6.35%
6M
7.34%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VMRXX
Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares
1.50%4.25%3.45%4.65%0.00%0.01%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.35%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VMRXX and ONEV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.05

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMRXX
ONEV

Financial Services

17.8%
12.1%

Basic Materials

-

4.0%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.5%

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

13.9%

Industrials

-

19.5%

Real Estate

-

5.2%

Technology

-

11.0%

Utilities

-

8.9%

Financial Services

VMRXX
17.8%
ONEV
12.1%

Basic Materials

VMRXX

-

ONEV
4.0%

Communication Services

VMRXX

-

ONEV
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VMRXX

-

ONEV
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

VMRXX

-

ONEV
8.5%

Energy

VMRXX

-

ONEV
1.6%

Healthcare

VMRXX

-

ONEV
13.9%

Industrials

VMRXX

-

ONEV
19.5%

Real Estate

VMRXX

-

ONEV
5.2%

Technology

VMRXX

-

ONEV
11.0%

Utilities

VMRXX

-

ONEV
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMRXX vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMRXX

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMRXXONEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMRXX Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the ONEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMRXX and ONEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMRXXONEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67

1.07

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.77

0.55

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.76

0.67

+2.09

Drawdowns

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMRXX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ONEV drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMRXX and ONEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMRXXONEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-39.72%

+39.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-7.75%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

0.00%

-14.81%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

0.00%

-18.52%

+18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.94%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.90%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

2.27%

-2.27%

Volatility

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) is 0.30%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that VMRXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMRXXONEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

2.35%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

7.74%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12%

11.19%

-10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.02%

14.54%

-13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.02%

17.03%

-16.01%

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMRXX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMRXX vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison

VMRXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than ONEV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.76%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
VMRXX
Vanguard Cash Reserves Federal Money Market Fund Admiral Shares
3.88%4.15%3.38%4.54%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMRXX and ONEV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEV has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to VMRXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMRXX dropped 0.00% vs ONEV's -39.72%.

VMRXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMRXX and ONEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer