PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMOT vs. IVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMOT vs. IVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than IVAL's 13.29% return.


VMOT

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.80%
YTD
17.28%
6M
20.07%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*

IVAL

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.49%
YTD
13.29%
6M
16.64%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMOT vs. IVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
17.28%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-7.00%3.52%4.69%4.59%-15.64%14.62%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
13.29%34.92%-0.71%20.61%-10.06%-0.22%-4.94%21.26%-22.50%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and IVAL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.70

The correlation between VMOT and IVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. IVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMOT
IVAL

Industrials

19.9%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.8%
23.5%

Technology

11.4%
3.9%

Energy

8.6%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
1.8%

Financial Services

8.1%

-

Communication Services

7.3%
2.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
21.2%

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Industrials

VMOT
19.9%
IVAL
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VMOT
18.8%
IVAL
23.5%

Technology

VMOT
11.4%
IVAL
3.9%

Energy

VMOT
8.6%
IVAL
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

VMOT
8.5%
IVAL
7.4%

Healthcare

VMOT
8.4%
IVAL
1.8%

Financial Services

VMOT
8.1%
IVAL

-

Communication Services

VMOT
7.3%
IVAL
2.1%

Basic Materials

VMOT
5.1%
IVAL
21.2%

Utilities

VMOT
3.3%
IVAL

-

Real Estate

VMOT
0.6%
IVAL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMOT vs. IVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMOT vs. IVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMOTIVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.88

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

10.17

+3.25

VMOT vs. IVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and IVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMOTIVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.11

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.47

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.34

+0.01

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. IVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum IVAL drawdown of -46.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and IVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOTIVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-46.09%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-11.24%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-14.92%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-31.01%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-2.94%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-12.00%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.18%

-0.60%

Volatility

VMOT vs. IVAL - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) at 3.82%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMOTIVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.82%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

12.00%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

15.37%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

17.74%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

18.84%

-3.94%

VMOT vs. IVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IVAL's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMOT vs. IVAL - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than IVAL's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.66%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.75%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMOT and IVAL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMOT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to IVAL (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs IVAL's -46.09%.

On 5-year performance, IVAL leads with 8.36% vs 6.94% for VMOT. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

VMOT is categorized as Momentum, while IVAL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.39% for IVAL.

VMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMOT and IVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer