VMOT vs. IHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF).
VMOT and IHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMOT is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index. It was launched on May 3, 2017. IHF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. Both VMOT and IHF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMOT or IHF.
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and IHF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VMOT vs. IHF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VMOT:
0.89
IHF:
-0.12
VMOT:
1.28
IHF:
-0.06
VMOT:
1.16
IHF:
0.99
VMOT:
0.74
IHF:
-0.11
VMOT:
4.24
IHF:
-0.28
VMOT:
3.11%
IHF:
7.39%
VMOT:
14.74%
IHF:
16.55%
VMOT:
-34.71%
IHF:
-58.82%
VMOT:
-5.19%
IHF:
-10.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than IHF's 9.42% return.
VMOT
3.37%
1.30%
5.69%
11.59%
3.02%
N/A
IHF
9.42%
5.19%
-7.27%
-1.60%
5.62%
8.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMOT vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IHF's 0.43% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMOT vs. IHF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VMOT
IHF
VMOT vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMOT vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than IHF's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 2.46% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% | 0.18% |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and IHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMOT vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 3.47%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.